Tova vsichkoto doide ot finansova gledna tochka, smisul, matematikata si e matematika, i poneje finansovo se praviat malki greshki moje bi i v fizikata sushto. vse pak finansovo sushto e microcosmos, ne po-malko slojen(ako ne i po-slojen) ot vselenata.

Za tova si pomislih che praviat tazi greshka, umnojavat neshto po sebe si ili po derivativ na sebe si, no ne usuznavat tochno kakvo, ili che se e promenilo. Poradi untimatter, ili skorostta na svetlinata/ ili nalichieto na cherna dupka, kudeto fizikata se izkriviava.

Chisto intuitivno, bez niakakvi matematicheski dokazatalstva, instinktivno mi doide na um che svetlinata po-priroda ne e tova koeto mislim, ili che e suvkupnost ot niakolko neshta koito ne mojem da razgranichim, chisto filosofski go kazvam bez da znam kakvo govoria, mi se struva samo che ako svetlinata ne izbiagva dori ot cherna dupka, edinstvenata i nai silna sila vav sveta bi bila gravitaciata, samo deto mi se stori che ne moje da e tolkova prosto, samo zaradi tozi fack :) si pomislih che svetlinata e suvkupnost ot mnogo neshta, i samo vidimata chast se vliae ot gravitaciata. kato ventilator koito ti duha drehite, no ne vliae tolkova na organite ti.

Za tova mislia che Einstein ne e che greshi, a tochno obratnoto, zalojeno e tova v teoriata mu, samo deto oshte ne se znae koga tochno teoriata mu se promenia - poradi samata natura na teoriata mu. Toest C na kvadrat vsushtnost ne vinagi e konstant, pak e C na kvadrat, ama C se promenia. I misleh che za tova ne mogat da razberat sledvasht etap. i niakoi izchislenia ne izlizat. MOje bi zaradi lipsa na data, ili na dostatuchno dobra tehnologia, ili na moia greshka v misleneto, ili v izmestvane na centur. NO SAS SIGURNOST IMA NESHTO. Ako gravitaciata beshe nai i edinstvena sila nepodvlastna na nishto drugo, niamashe nachin sveta da se razshiriava, tupo ama moje bi da.

Finansovata korolacia e che ne moje vsichko da zavisi ot pari, i ne parite ni kontrolirat nas a nie parite - filosofski poglednato samo. Dori i nai goliamata kompania moje da falira vupreki pritegatelnata sila na parite. MOje da zagubi naturata si. :)

it might be some corrolation to "double dip" theory might be some corrolation to phisics too as to the nature of the universe, humans cannot create anything not bound by natural laws. maybe it might explain segregation of larger companie, maybe even why the octopus picked Spain to wil the world CUP - maybe :) - forget I said that. :):)

Now its hard to explain how this would change personal business desisions an a tiny scale as me, but it truly does.
First of all its not money that's the problem, its the misunderstanding. MOney can be chanelled towards a better long term output. people don't understand their role at a global level, so money will help in adjusting my tiny distribution capabilities towards a larger/not so apparent long term goal. Namely invest in the people once again. ) Noone knows the value of money at this stage - "C" squared has changed. noone knows how, but I think its rather when, that's important. And its not when in terms only of time, but in terms of thought process. the rest is not important, there is no why.
Less money, more output, less money and more people rather, and time is on our side - long term, chanels towards future distribution - completely logical. Nothing is lost really. Fucking stupid partner, how can he think I would not notice, he still did not get that we are working together, he lost.

This is not good for me, at this stage I only have a few people here and there. nothing else, find where you stand first, forget things at the back, even if it shows incompetence and deal with things at the front. Changing the front, on some level changes the back. So priority, get a few hundred euro for a cash registers.

Pokrai tova sas Stephen Hawking i finansovite analizi, moje bi-mislia che e vazmojno do nai malka stepen - da ..............stiga do tova che 3 na 3ta stepen ne e ravno na 3x3x3, poradi sushtata prichina hawking e pulna izmislica. No dnes uspiah da go formuliram savsem malko po-dobre. toest 3 na stepen 3 e - 3 X sebesi X sebesi. koeto v obshhti linii e taka ama vav visshata matematika moje da ne znachi nishto. poradi prichinata che sebesi sled izvestno vreme moje da e savsem razlichno(einstein + teoriata che energiata ne se gubi a si promenia formata + nalichnostta na antimatter), toest 3 joula energia predi 1 milliard godini ne e 3 joula energia sega, i dori ne e 3 joula energia pri skorost na svetlinata. Spored men tova promenia neshtata dori formulata na einstein moje da ima dopulnenie(to vsiaka formula ima dopulnenie, no e vazmojno, da ne kazvam neshto goliamo, shtoto sigurno gresha no moje da e tova). Mislia che niama nachin golemi ucheni da ne go znaiat tova, no si mislia che nai veroiatno ne go vzimat predvid vseki put i niakoi puti smiatat 3 na treta stepen, i tova oburkva celite im teorii. Vse si mislia che ako e tolkova prosto moje bi go znaiat, ili che e greshno, no moje bi go znaiat, no go propuskat poradi tolkova goliamo kolichestvo danni. ili po enercia, ili einstein e izgladil druga formula - ne newton ili neshto drugo i nikoi ne e zabeliazal. Tova idva ot teoriata na otnositelnostta na Einstein. ...........imam dopulnenie na teoriata na otnositelnostta na Eistein. Ne znam, vruzva se i s mnogo drugi neshta koito ne moga da izrazia v momenta Ne znam, sigurno gresha, ama doide i ot finansovia analiz, pomnish li kakvo ti kazah za razdelianeto na firmite, sega kazvat che shte ima dvoen spad, a spored men ne e za tova a za razdelenie. shizophronen proces, edno neshto e po-dobre, drugo po-zle. smisul 3 dolara predi 10 godini ne e 3 dolara sega. ne mojesh da umnojish 3 po sebe si v razlichni vremevi prostranstva, prosto ne se znae kak sa se promenili. Ima li niakakuv smisul? Ne znam

Brazil will beat Germany in final 2-1.

Go GHANA!!!!!

Date log - personal observation of hawking theory.

A Brief History of a Fly's journey to the moon.

Prologue
To The DARK SIDE OF THE MOON, to those of you who underestimated the fly ability and ambition from reading the title.

Stephen Hawking - his theories of mathematics / spirituality and "Disc World".

Start with - Lacking humanity, its real maybe, but utterly off balance, off centre and wrong in direction and application. Even mathematical conclusions when true are still off centre, have no link to ground. Only use is (as completely leftist) if someone counters it with an appropriate "right wing" (language poor in description of his fantasies). Currently not aware of a rightist Genius of his calibre, and doubt there ever will be. So have to disregard everything, all his theories, for the sake of level/ballance Completely unusable, probably before his time, I would even have to say it will never be usable as it would require someone to build a puzzle from one piece and no picture, he wants the world to draw the picture for him, fucking arrogant manipulative little prick. He's a joke he is folding in on himself he does not respect enertia, his theories do not make sense to him, (Einstein's phraze if you understand what I'm saying it means that I did not do my job well .....(paraphrazing) is not applicable here as he would like you to believe), Beauty is he KNOWS ALL THIS, and that is why he is where he is. He knows this, but does not know why he is conjuring it as a world theory and uses "understandable" "only to him language", he chooses to only trust himself. He thinks it is the world, not his creation of the world. Its a joke. Mathematically also its a joke, folding in of matter, total incompleteness of it , it would do that yes, but only in lack of opposing force,of which - lack there isn't, further more if there happens to be discovered a way to eliminate the oposing force in the end, there is no clue whatsoever to suggest that it will actually do that as opposed to something completely different. That's a real downfall, mr hawking. The only truth to that theory would be the "theory" part, and further more it will in all probality not even that, and if that under soo spesific conditions that would deal with numbers of the odds of which near infinity to a power of something.Its incomprehensible, these kinds of numbers have not been computed yet - ever.

---------

POOR GUY HE IS DEALING WITH NUMBERS HE HASN'T THE VAGUEST COMPREHENSION OF

----------

(way beyond big bang callibre, you are selling a ferrari for the price of candy Mr Hawking, do you actually think noone will notice? You are a fraud, and you know it, Do you actually believe your game will last forever?, WAKE UP MISTER HAWKING WE ARE ALL IN THE SHIT, THAT IS NO REASON TO BLAME HUMANITY, BLAME GOD, BUT STOP WHAT YOU THINK YOU ARE DOING, FEW PEOPLE MIGHT KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, ADD A FEW ZEROS AND NOONE CAN UNDERSTAND RIGHT? BUT YOU KNOW. YOU ARE A BAD MAN, YOU ARE BAD TO HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. CONFESS - YOU KNOW ALL TOO WELL WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, YOUR TIME NEVER WAS). Just A few simple words I AM LOST AND ALLWAYS WAS, I made it all up. You know Mr Hawking, it will set you free.

CONFESS, YOU AND YOUR POSSY OF CAMBRIDGE MONKEYS ARE ON A RUNAWAY TRAIN. I'M NOT DOUBTING YOUR UNDERSTANDING(well even that is not true, a stopped clock can show time twice a day more accurately than any atomic clock ever designed.) OF ANYTHING ALLREADY PUBLISHED, EINSTEIN OR OTHER, BUT YOU HAVE NOTHING, NOTHING. CONFESS EVERYTHING IS YOU(THAT IS NOT THE WORLD). Its inevitable, you are in hell and you think its because you are right, no that pain is different and you know it. I guarantee you by the end of your life, you will do it, all this will not last forever. get your whole team of fucking egocentrics to resign and go back to school.

HE DOES KNOW THIS, AND THAT MAKES HIM SOO DANGEROUS.

He is like a new Jet with only one wing, and wonders why he crashes, dscribing with eloquence and beauty even the twirling elipses he makes as laws of aerodinamics.That is not the world, nor is it evidence of any kind whatsoever, except that he is lost.

He is not that important, his work is not that important, its only important to him, at the cost to everyone else, further more it has nothing to do with anything.

Comparing him to Einstein is not only funny, offensive but deconstructive of his work.

He's crashed so many times he is convinced that noone else can fly, a false profit :):)

He should forget the world, and concentrate on components, that's his talent. Wait, its a joke there too really, even more so because he might be right. He is like a radar, wery usefull, wait only if he does not think for himself, what good is a radar with an opinion of that to bradcast and limited understanding leading him to broadcast ewhat he pleases, how does the pilot know what is real and what is immagination. He spreads lies consealed as truths, he thinks he has it all covered. :):)

His use is to get weather readings a true genious in that, but actually not, actually completely useless because he distorts them his his own fantasies. AGAIN COMPLETELY USELESS. A man that has one leg shorter than the other and notices the suns movement, using it coinside it with the circle he's walking on.
Putting a mathematical name to something that is happening to him does not make it mathematics, does not make it higher mathematics, does not make it real.

The people that follow him are useless in interpretation, not to mention application, not to mention

Forget him, forget hid books, forget every single piece of information he's ever published. He should go back to teaching what other people have discovered. He is the epiphany of uselessness. Dangerous uselessness, forget eloquent descriptions, they are only there to disorient you. He's like the clock that shows the correct time only 2 times a day. in order for there to be any use (I even throw away my first interpretation) there needs not only be invented a clock that shows the correct time exactly for the amount of time that he does not, but that clock has to know at what time of the day that time would be. He is not that important as he wants you to believe, further more he knows this, he does it on purpose, which makes him nothing short of a threat to scientific and mathematical development. He is a double agent. It will never happen, A clock that simply tell time will make him the broken piece of machinery that he is. Completely useless and dangerous in that. I have carried on this long as the levels that he operates on are nothing short of disastrous!!!! GO BACK TO SCHOOL, quickly, teach, write poetry and fiction, thats what you are doing anyway,at call it by what it is. He is a heretic, a mathematical heretic, a spiritual and human perspective heretic heretic heretic. HIS THEORIES ARE NULL AND VOID AND ITS BEST TO NOT HAVE READ THEM AT ALL. ITS A FACT THAT HE WILL BE COMPLETELY FORGOTTEN.

A brief history of time? - A BRIEF HISTORY OF A FLY"S JOURNEY TO THE MOON.
DAMN IT - I THOUGHT YOU HAD SOMETHING THERE. Fucking pretensious bastards, monkeys with immagination, a disease. DAMN IT. YOU WILL BE FORGOTTEN WITHIN YOUR LIFETIME, THIS IS A FACT. Damned monkeys.

They actually don't understand a simple log, I can't believe it. You don't understand a simple log equasion, go back to school, Mr hawking and take your whole possy with you. a power to a power - that is what you are dealing with Mr hawking - do you have any comprehenstion of the implication of this.

Do you know the story of a the guy who invented chess Mr hawking, the king/sheich offered to pay him, he said I do not want a payment except for a grain of wheat on the first square, 2 on the second, 4 on the third, 8, 16, 32 etc, the King said - stupid man he's about to give up his invention for a handfull of wheat grains

on the 64 is a number of 2 to the power 64 grains of wheat. - do you know the amount of wheat that is - more wheat that has ever been grown in the world ever, combined. that number is not the same if it were raised to the power of 64 by itself. you have no comprehension of simple arithmetics, Mr Hawking let alone higher mathematics. What school grade is a power taught in again? That's where you should start. I'll pay you 2 to the power 64 to the power 64 grains of wheat Mr Hawking, is the kind of payout you want for your theory, you fucking Fibanachi replica - go explain that to the world - how that is possible mathematically.

Who the fuck do you think you are? The world is bigger and deeper than you think Mr Hawking. Even when I'm wrong - you are still what you are Mr hawking an arrogant little angry man thinking that you can place a price on a human soul, could that be your method? Its a dead end, you are a dead end. fucking clown selling the world for a few grains of wheat.

HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. I'M NOT CLEVER ENOUGH TO BE THE ONLY ONE.

J, I can dislocate him at the base, with a simple equasion, right at the point where he read Einstein not even later. Ha ha :) Now the reason why that is the base and not anywhere else is a whole different matter and how that involves his ego would be I would say impossible. That's why I'm so angry at his possy of cambridge monkeys. Why do you think his description involves playing cards. 2 to the power 2 is not the same as 2 x 2. Its 2 times itself, which just happens to be 2. what are we talking about here? Thats where he left off grade 1. people might argue, wait you don't understand. Don't I? is this higher mathematics or not? 3x3 is not = 3x2 its not even = 3 times what would seem to be itself. :) I would not even say it's about how, or why, but when!!!!! What did Eistein talk about - space time, not space. 3to the power 2 means 3x3, but wait a second, Einstein knows he does not understand. He knows it might not be 3x3, as by that time the second 3 might have changed. simple analog 3 dollars 10 years ago is not 3 dollars today. What are we talking about here. why does space seem to fold. :). Look at it financially, you have 3 dollars ten years ago, that same 3 dollars change over time for whatever reasons, inflation, interest, denomination, 5 years ago its not 3 dollars any more, its 5 dollars, today its not 5 dollars its 0.5 dollars. is 3 to the power 3 really 27. ferrary for the price of candy is ok analog in the end. I don't know, there might be a discrepancy even in Einstein here. I doubt it though, what are the chances. I'm no where near Einstein. but by saying 3 to the power two is allways 9 seems a bit presumptuos, let alone take a trillion to the power of a trillion - do we know anything? I think carefull consideration has to be applied in calculations like that as to the time when they are applied. Applied now it might be so, applied at speed of light it might be something completely different. Applied tomorrow can be the same as today, it could have changed by an unnoticeble fraction, simply because of the time. I don't know. Even without taking time into consideration, only space/or if I'm interpreting time in a wrong way, its still useless on other levels. :) egocentric - that's all his "theories" are. If not now within a few years they will move to the hype/fantazy section in the library.